Subscribe to our newsletter!

Posts Tagged ‘Taxes’

Bad news if you plan on retiring with a nest egg…

Friday, April 16th, 2010

Today’s article. 2009 Tax Season: Last Good Year for High-Earning Americans? is short and sweet, but very important.  Now, I know many of you will read what it has to say and decide that it has nothing to do with you, but the fact of the matter is that if you plan on retiring with a nest egg, then it does, in fact, pertain to you.

The article  revolves around 3 tax problems…the Bush administration tax cuts, the Estate tax and the investment income tax.  The Bush administration tax cuts are about to expire.  This isn’t a concern for many Americans, but to those it affects, it will mean a large chunk of money out of their monthly budget. 

The Estate tax, however, will affect many more people, since it covers anyone who leaves behind an inheritance between $1 million and $10 million dollars.  Don’t think it’s a big deal to tax estates?  Well, If you’re planning on having a nest egg, saving your pennies now for retirement, then you should think it’s a big deal.  Many of you will reach the minimum $1 million dollar cut off, and if you fall into that estate range, you should know that your estate will be taxed at a 55%  tax rate!  And for most of us, we will just barely break into the $1 million dollar range, which means that you proudly managed to save up all of that money, only to have $550,000 of your $1 million dollars taken by the government.  Take my advice and start “gifting” (check into yearly limits on how much you can gift per person) some money while you’re alive if you fall in this category.

The last tax issue covered in the article is the investment income tax (also called a capital gains tax) that is slated to raise in 2013.  I know this sounds like it only affects people “on Wall Street”, but I’ve got news for you; If you have stocks, bonds, precious metals or property, and sell them for a profit (with few exceptions), then you will be feeling the raise in this tax.  Stocks and bonds outside of retirement accounts might not be something many people participate in, but lots of people buy and sell property, and if you do, you will feel the change!

I know it’s hard to look 20 or 30 years in the future and see how these things might affect you, but you have to go there.  You have to know what you’re up against.  These changes in the tax code will be painful on more of us than we are led to believe.  Remember, saving $1000 a month will (on average, based on assumed 8% return) put $1 million dollars in your bank account in 28 years.  That isn’t too far fetched.  You could definitely do that.  And given that fact, you should worry about how it will be taxed.

They want to tax your junk food.

Friday, January 15th, 2010

A new article from WalletPop.com is discussing the good and bad things that could come from a tax on soda/junk food.  The article, titled Should we tax junk food to control obesity?, caught my attention right away. 

Now, one might think that this is a good plan, since the article sights some very compelling statistics, including the following:

  • 58 million people are overweight, 40 million are obese, and 3 million are morbidly obese
  • Eight out of 10 are over 25 lbs. overweight
  • 78% of Americans are not meeting basic activity level recommendations
  • 25% are completely sedentary
  • 76% increase in Type II diabetes in adults 30-40 years old since 1990

What does this mean to us?  It means that, yes, we are getting fatter.  A lot fatter.  We are coming up with new products like body shapers to hide our fat rolls, and some sort of tape to make our arms look thinner!  Don’t believe me?  Check this out!  And I don’t think anybody remembers the word “muffin top” ever being used until we started wearing pants that sat low enough on our hips to “show off” our fat rolls.  By the way, if you have a muffin top, by a bigger size and a belt! 

So we’re getting fatter!  I hate it!  I love to exercise, and I try to watch what I eat…but I’m not a health nut.  I have junk food on occasion!  I am not model thin, and don’t expect that I ever will be, since my goal is strength and not a 22 inch waistline.  However, I keep my weight within a normal weight range and an average Body Fat Percentage.  I worry about the people I see and know that don’t get any exercise, and don’t watch what they eat at all.  I worry for their lives!  I don’t, however, think that taxing the people to the poor house is the way to go about fixing it!  We’re nuts if we think these people don’t know that this food/soda is bad for them.  They know it!  Punishing them (i.e. taxing them) for their “bad behaviour” is not a RIGHT that I want to give our government, thank you very much.  The next thing you know, the government will be punishing us for all of our bad behaviours, like watching too much TV, not flossing and not recycling ALL of our trash!  It’s not up to them to legislate our behaviour. 

The article takes a much more positive approach to this tax then I would.  Yes, it breaks my heart to see children and teenagers that are not active at all.  12 year old girls that have to shop in the “women’s plus” size section at a store because the cool, stylish clothes for their age don’t fit them.  I want these people to get healthy as much as the next person, but it has to start at home.  They have to decide for themselves that they are dissatisfied with how they look and how they feel.  And then, they have to be mad enough at themselves to do something about it! 

The article says that the taxes raised could be used for education and health programs.  Yeah, it could, but it won’t be.  Have we all forgotten the promise of lottery money being used for education (read this)?  Think about it rationally, without emotion…you know as well as I do that they won’t use the money for what they say they will, or if they do, it will be like 1% of the revenue.   Taxing these people won’t fix the problem, and I don’t want the government legislating what I do or don’t eat.