Subscribe to our newsletter!

Archive for the ‘Friday’s Financial News!’ Category

Cars, cell phones and burgers…

Friday, February 12th, 2010

While researching for today’s financial news post, I had a problem that I’m not sure has happened in the past.  I found TOO MANY good articles to write about!  Now, they’re not exactly hard hitting journalism, but they are all something our readers/consumers should be aware of, and so I’ve decided to share them all.  For the full story/article, you will need to click on the link and read it at the source.

  • Majority of scrapped GM,Chrysler dealers file appeals - Basically, what’s going on here is that GM and Chrysler, in order to stay in business, had to cancel contracts with some of the dealerships that owned the rights to sell their cars.  The dealerships, instead of finding a different product to sell, or closing down, are filing appeals to FORCE the 2 companies to keep supplying them with inventory or to pay a huge settlement.  This will cost the already struggling automakers (remember, they were bailed out already) even more money, and they probably will struggle with getting back on track and making a profit.  I hate that these dealerships will have to close and that jobs will be lost, but when a company expands too far and has to draw back to stay in business, this is what happens.  By trying for a settlement (these dealerships agreed to the terms of the contract, they knew the contract could be terminated), they are actually hurting the company more.  Nice.
  • Toyota’s next problem: Lawsuits - With the multitude of recent news stories and recalls, Toyota is working around the clock to combat the bad press and sort out their problems.  It might not help, though, thanks to the over 30 lawsuits (already, and growing) and class action suit (there will probably be more later) that are already filed against the automaker.  Here’s the deal…Toyota should pay for any medical bills (and final expenses etc.) of those people found to have directly been injured or died because of a faulty piece of equipment in the vehicle, and I have no doubts in my mind that they would willingly pay these costs.  There are 2 problems that stink with this situation though; 1. Some lawyers just see dollar signs and think of a big payday, so they will file suit for ANYTHING, even things their client doesn’t deserve, and some judges will award it, which just causes more financial problems for the automaker, and could cost jobs for their employees, and 2. the more lawsuits and such that are filed, the more bad press they receive, which could also cost money/employee’s jobs.
  • Your cell phone company’s dirty little secret - The big carriers have come out recently and lowered their prices on the “voice usage” side, or the “talk time” side of their business, but their secret is that they’ve started charging non smartphone users a fee to access the multimedia capabilities of their phones, whether they want to or not.  They say it’s because most people don’t know they can access the net, so they are making sure the user gets full use of their phone.  I say bull crap.  I shouldn’t be forced to purchase a service I don’t want.  I have a smartphone and DO NOThave a data package, because I don’t need one.  I did not buy the phone for it’s ability to surf Facebook, I bought it for other features like touch screen/qwerty keyboard/nice layout/and a calendar.  Maybe it’s more phone than I needed, but that’s my choice.  They know that people pick the phone they want, and so they figure they can charge you extra for service, because you like the phone.  It’s sneaky, but clever.
  • The burger and beverage recession - This one actually surprised me, but not in a bad way.  Coca cola, McDonald’s and Molson Coors all reported that their product demand is stronger abroad than in the US.  These are the products that we think of as recession proof, but apparently, people are still not willing to part with their dollars for them!  I very much hope that the companies can cut costs and innovate to continue to be profitable, but I am very excited that consumers continue to be wise with their money.  Spending less and saving more is a proven way to have something for yourself as you get older.  Are there quicker, more volatile ways?  Of course.  But with great gains comes great risks.

Follow the links to see the full articles!

Reality check for the amount you’re saving…

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Do you think you”re saving enough?  If so, are you sure?

Today’s article, titled, How much should I save?by Donna Rosato, is an in depth look at an entrepreneur and her retirement portfolio.  The entrepreneur is hoping that a financial planner who looked at her portfolio will “bless it” and tell her good job.  Unfortunately, like most people, she isn’t saving as much as she thinks she is!  Most people think that by saving anything, or by getting their “company match” in a 401k program that they are set for retirement…they’re not.  Yes, it is good to get that company match, but if that is ALL you’re saving, you won’t be able to retire with the same lifestyle you have now, and that is where the misconception comes in for a lot of people.  They think, “oh, well, as long as I get my company match, I can retire living at the same level I live at right now”.  WRONG!  If it were that easy, we’d all retire with no debt and a vacation condo!!  As the financial planner in the article figures out, the entrepreneur is saving less than half of what she needs to retire at her current lifestyle level. 

What is going on here?  As adults, we underestimate things…it’s what we do.  For example, we underestimate the amount of calories we take in in a day (to the tune of 20%-40% from what I have read) and we underestimate how much we should be saving.  So, how do you keep from underestimating things?  Get some help!  You can pay for it, or get the free kind.  Either will be better than nothing, but if you’re paying for it, be sure that the expert isn’t just trying to sell you products…if they are, then they DO NOT have your best interests in mind!  Need some basic (and free) ideas on how much you should be saving?  Check out this link at CNN Money, to get a rough idea of where you are and what you need.  Some extra tips are to be diversified, preferably in growth stock mutual funds, and, the article and I agree, that small cap, mid cap, large cap and international funds are all good places to invest your cash.   Whatever you do, figure out what you need to retire.  Don’t just think that a 6%-8% contribution to your 401k is enough.  Max it out!!  Start contributing to a Roth IRAHAPPEN to your life…don’t let your life HAPPEN to you!!!

Why handouts aren’t good in the long run…

Friday, January 29th, 2010

A new blog post by one of my favorite Authors/entrepreneurs, Dan Miller, caught my eye, and I thought it would be worth sharing.  The post, titled, When Helping Hurts focuses on some recent developments regarding our national unemployment program.

The government is looking into extending benefits in the unemployment program for the 5th (that’s right, I said 5th) time since the recession started, just a couple of years ago!  Normally, the benefits are doled out to the unemployed over 26 weeks (aka 6 months), with the option to get a 13 week extension.  Basically, this means that you can draw unemployment for 9 months before you have to go back to work, and a lot of people do just that!  They collect full benefits before even really trying to get a job!  Why, you ask?  Well, I assume for some it’s because they think it’s “free money”, but, as we all know, that’s never the case for anything.  Somebody always pays, be it the company, the taxpayers, the government (which takes its money from the taxpayers) or the consumer (who is almost always ALSO a taxpayer).  Under the new proposed benefits, the pay outs can run as long as 99 weeks…almost 2 YEARS!

The funny thing is that some studies sited in the post indicate that people are most likely to find a job when the unemployment runs out, no matter if that length of time is 2, 26 or 99 weeks.    People seem to think that because they are drawing unemployment, they economy must really be in the toilet for everyone, and so they don’t try.  However, when there is no more unemployment, they “magically” find work.  Amazing!

There are many examples of these programs being run the wrong way and abused by some of the participants.  I’m not going to get into that, because I have a feeling many of you wouldn’t want to read a post that long.  If I’m wrong, say so in the comment section, and I’d be happy to oblige!

Dan Miller draws an interesting observation, drawing a parallel between the way bears hunt and the way we as humans acquire a job.  Bears hunt more efficiently when they aren’t given food from humans…you know, when they have to hunt.  We are the same way with money and jobs.  When there isn’t somebody giving them to us, we get creative and figure out a way to do it.  Be that start our own company, go to work for someone else or sell some stuff, we will make it work.  Can’t find work in your area?  Perhaps you should move.  Think outside the box people!

Oh, the insanity!

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Just when you think you’ve seen all the silly things you can on the Internet, you run across something that makes you CRACK UP LAUGHING!  Such it today’s article, 9 reasons to love credit cards, by Liz  Pulliam Weston.  As the title might indicate to you, our readers, I’m not a fan…and that’s putting it lightly! 

The article is a little lengthy, but it’s worth the read, if only so you can laugh at it as you read.  Here are some highlights:

  • Arbitration – The author says that credit card arbitration is a fabulous feature.  Well, when I used credit cards, I never had to use this feature, even when I had problems with stores.  Also, opinions are split as to whether arbitration is good or bad.  This article says the consumer doesn’t usually come out on the winning end. 
  • Automatic bill payment – Obviously, you can set up your bills to be paid from your account.  So?  You can do that with a debit card as well, which comes from YOUR money, not borrowed money. 
  • Bulwark against identity theft – The author points out that credit card companies have laws in place to make sure they don’t charge you for fraudulent charges, after a $50 fee, within 60 days.  This is true.  However, debit cards have systems in place as well.  Within 2 days, it’s a $50 fee and a $500 fee up to 60 days.  Most banks voluntarily choose to extend the $50 fee to 60 days, and not charge $500.  So again, it’s a wash.
  • Credit Improvement – I wish people would quit focusing on “improving your credit score through credit cards!  Having cash to pay for things makes credit cards pointless, doesn’t it?  Which makes your credit score less important.  Yes, you might need it to buy a house, but if you put at least 10% to 20% down when you buy the house, and have a good income, I doubt they will pay close attention to your credit score.
  • Extended Warranties – These things are a waste of money most of the time anyway, so tauting them as an advantage doesn’t really make sense.  Period.
  • Interest Free Loans – Well, interest free loans don’t matter if you pay for what you want with cash!  If you don’t have the money for it, don’t buy it.  Want money for “emergencies”??  That’s why you have an emergency fund!
  • Purchase Protection - Some cards pay to fix or replace items broken that you paid for with a credit card.  They don’t do it out of the kindness of their hearts.  You, and others, are probably paying for it, you just might not know you are.
  • Rental Car Coverage – Your auto insurance covers this.  So, why do you need more?  A silly advantage, considering auto insurance is mandatory, and credit cards are not!
  • Rewards, Rewards, Rewards- Yes, some cards offer rewards, but that only encourages you to use them more!  Also, unless you stay in hotels a lot, fly a lot or whatever else they offer “points” for, the points are not useful.  Other rewards are usually not worth it, or are something that you could have bought outright, and saved on interest if you carried a balance.  I do know 1 person who got use out of their points, but it was her business credit card.  In general, not worth it!

My favorite quote from the article:  “I get all these goodies largely because so many other folks play the credit card game so badly.  The profits they generate for the credit card issuers essentially pay for my freebies.”  So, she plays the “game” well, and you pay for her rewards and benefits.  Why not just get out of the game?  Use debit cards or cash.  You’ll save more money in the long run!

They want to tax your junk food.

Friday, January 15th, 2010

A new article from WalletPop.com is discussing the good and bad things that could come from a tax on soda/junk food.  The article, titled Should we tax junk food to control obesity?, caught my attention right away. 

Now, one might think that this is a good plan, since the article sights some very compelling statistics, including the following:

  • 58 million people are overweight, 40 million are obese, and 3 million are morbidly obese
  • Eight out of 10 are over 25 lbs. overweight
  • 78% of Americans are not meeting basic activity level recommendations
  • 25% are completely sedentary
  • 76% increase in Type II diabetes in adults 30-40 years old since 1990

What does this mean to us?  It means that, yes, we are getting fatter.  A lot fatter.  We are coming up with new products like body shapers to hide our fat rolls, and some sort of tape to make our arms look thinner!  Don’t believe me?  Check this out!  And I don’t think anybody remembers the word “muffin top” ever being used until we started wearing pants that sat low enough on our hips to “show off” our fat rolls.  By the way, if you have a muffin top, by a bigger size and a belt! 

So we’re getting fatter!  I hate it!  I love to exercise, and I try to watch what I eat…but I’m not a health nut.  I have junk food on occasion!  I am not model thin, and don’t expect that I ever will be, since my goal is strength and not a 22 inch waistline.  However, I keep my weight within a normal weight range and an average Body Fat Percentage.  I worry about the people I see and know that don’t get any exercise, and don’t watch what they eat at all.  I worry for their lives!  I don’t, however, think that taxing the people to the poor house is the way to go about fixing it!  We’re nuts if we think these people don’t know that this food/soda is bad for them.  They know it!  Punishing them (i.e. taxing them) for their “bad behaviour” is not a RIGHT that I want to give our government, thank you very much.  The next thing you know, the government will be punishing us for all of our bad behaviours, like watching too much TV, not flossing and not recycling ALL of our trash!  It’s not up to them to legislate our behaviour. 

The article takes a much more positive approach to this tax then I would.  Yes, it breaks my heart to see children and teenagers that are not active at all.  12 year old girls that have to shop in the “women’s plus” size section at a store because the cool, stylish clothes for their age don’t fit them.  I want these people to get healthy as much as the next person, but it has to start at home.  They have to decide for themselves that they are dissatisfied with how they look and how they feel.  And then, they have to be mad enough at themselves to do something about it! 

The article says that the taxes raised could be used for education and health programs.  Yeah, it could, but it won’t be.  Have we all forgotten the promise of lottery money being used for education (read this)?  Think about it rationally, without emotion…you know as well as I do that they won’t use the money for what they say they will, or if they do, it will be like 1% of the revenue.   Taxing these people won’t fix the problem, and I don’t want the government legislating what I do or don’t eat.

Married Couples pay more under new health bill!

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Today’s article, from the Wall Street Journal, titled Married Couples Pay More Than Unmarried Under Health Bill, is obviously about the new health care bill.  Apparently, under the new bill, if a married couple doesn’t receive insurance from their employer, and instead chooses the public option, they will be out a lot more money than their unmarried (couples who live together and share bills but aren’t married) counterparts. 

The article looks at an unmarried couple who make a combined income of $50,000, and a married couple who make a combined income of $50,000.  The unmarried couple will pay only (yeah, only…ha ha) $3,076 a year under the House bill and $3,450 under the Senate bill.  If that couple decides to get married, they would have to pay $5,160 under the House bill and $5,100 under the Senate bill.  That’s a difference of between $2,084 and $1,650 respectively!  Just for deciding to get married.  The individuals that helped write the bill (democratic staff) acknowledged the existence of the penalty, but said that it couldn’t be fixed without creating other inequities.  To me, this seems like a pretty big penalty to be left in place, for fear that you would upset another group, or be unfair to others.  I mean, married couples are a pretty big group to upset!

The article has this quote from a Democratic Senate Finance Committee aide  - “The Finance Committee, along with other committees in the Senate, took pains to craft the most equitable overall structure possible, and that’s what we have here,”.  The MOST EQUITABLE bill.  So, they know it’s not fair for everyone, and one group that will pay will be married people!  This gives people an incentive to stay single.  Great!  Just what we need in this country!  A financial incentive to lose the institution of marriage.  As a country, we’re already doing things that would have been morally wrong just 20 years ago.  Gone on 2 dates with someone?  Ehh, that’s long enough to sleep together.  And we wonder why children in the 6th grade are experimenting with sex…could it be their role models?

I know that legal “mumbo jumbo” is the last thing any of us want to read or look into, but I think it’s important that we know what is and isn’t being approved with the new health care bill, especially since our politicians have a habit of sneaking in extra things when they pass a bill/law.  Be aware of your government!  Watch what they’re doing.  If you don’t, then when things don’t go your way, you have NO RIGHT to complain!

Happy New Year 2010!

Friday, January 1st, 2010

Happy New Year 2010!  Enjoy the day with your friends and family, or recover quickly!

Merry Christmas 2009!

Friday, December 25th, 2009

Merry Christmas.  Go spend time with your family, as we will be having family time as well.

Gen Y-ers grow up!

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Today’s article is from Foxbusiness.com, and is titled Growing Up Financially Is Hard to Do by: Gail Buckner.  It’s some interesting commentary on how the Gen Y-ers are responding to the recent economic turmoil!

Generation Y is a term applied to those people currently 22 to 33 years old, of which, I am a member.  These people are typically the offspring of Baby Boomers, and according to many in the work force, are nothing like their parents, especially in how they view their jobs.  In the past, this (my) generation has been characterized as a bunch of job-hoppers.   But now that they and their friends are experiencing layoffs and financial problems, the number of those surveyed that had changed jobs in the last 2 years dropped from 40% to almost half of that, and almost a quarter of them plan to stay with their employer until they retire…now there’s some surprising information!

Another interesting thing of note, however, is that the economy and higher rates of unemployment have changed the optimism and confidence typically displayed by this group of people, and they are becoming more financially conservative…all I have to say is that it’s about time! 

Apparently, a new survey shows that 41% of Gen Y-ers have become more fiscally conservative in the last year, and nearly 2/3 say they’re “trying to save more now than a year ago”.  I think that is incredible!  To know that a lot of people from my generation are waking up and saving is great.  And as far as retirement, in the last year the number of Gen Y-ers that are saving for retirement rose from 18% to 53%, but the majority of them are only focused on an emergency fund (which is a good start!).  Considering that more than 30% of Gen Y-ers owe more than $5,000 in credit card debt, saving for an emergency and/or retirement is a nice change of pace. 

No matter what their motives, the Generation Y group has started to notice the benefits of saving money and job security.  I have feared that my fellow Gen Y-ers would never learn this lesson, but I am happily wrong.  Maybe it was the economy, maybe it was the fact that it became cool to be a “recessionista”…or maybe it was that we got tired of hearing the word “recessionista”, and started watching our money to get people to quit using that word…either way, it happened, and hopefully it’s here to stay!

A new twist on “Find a need and fill it!”

Friday, December 11th, 2009

Today’s post is based on a post by one of our favorite bloggers here at Southern Couple’s Guide, Dan Miller, author of 48 Days To The Work You Love.  The post is titled Find a Need and Fill it?, an old business motto that has been helping people find ways to become entrepreneurs and make money for years.  Some examples of filling a need would be inventing a wheel, inventing a steam engine or growing a crop that feeds many people, like potatoes or wheat. 

Dan Miller has pointed out other products in this post, however, that might not necessarily be able to be pigeon-holed in the need category.  He talks of the fancy tennis shoes that have come about in the near past, that help with stabilization and have a broader base, and their new counterparts that are narrower and simulate running barefoot at $245 a pop (I spent a lot of time deciding which way to go on this very topic when I decided to start running)!

Another product, Bling H2O, that has been on MTV is encrusted with Swarovski crystals that spell out “bling” on the bottle.  The funny part is that the water comes from Tennessee, and probably isn’t very “blinged-out” on some guys farm.  That doesn’t stop them from sealing the bottles with a cork and calling it “Limited Edition”.  The funny part is the price!  This water can be bought for $441 dollars a case (12 bottles) or $36.75 a bottle.  Can we say ridiculous?  Funny thing is, people are buying it! 

And this is Dan Miller’s point:  If you fill a need you can make a living.  If you fill a wantyou can get rich.  I agree with him wholeheartedly, I am simply dismayed at the reason for such a statement to be true.  In our instant gratification, want the best, have to be famous society, wants and desires trump needs.  We all have desires, and I think that’s OK.  But when we start to go into debt to obtain them, something is wrong.  When we start to think we “deserve” them, we are out of touch with reality, because the truth is that you don’t “deserve” anything just for being you…you have to earn it!  As sad as it is, however, it’s how things work today, so if you can find a want and fill it, go make yourself rich!